AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingRuntimePricing

← Whisper AI App

Whisper AI App — agentic threat model

5.7AIVSS 5.7 · Medium

Whisper AI App is a low-risk, single-purpose utility focused on speech-to-text transcription. It exhibits minimal agentic risk due to its lack of autonomous planning, tool execution, or multi-agent capabilities.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 5.3AARS uplift 0.45Factor sum 1.0/10Threat ×0.95Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.00
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.10
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.20
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.20
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.30

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Utilizes speech-to-text foundation models (likely OpenAI Whisper variants). Primary threats include adversarial audio inputs designed to cause transcription errors or bypass content filters, and potential model-stealing attacks if the proprietary wrapper is exposed.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Processes user-uploaded audio/video files and browser microphone streams. Risks include data exfiltration of sensitive spoken content, lack of clarity on data retention/purging policies, and potential data leakage if inputs are used for downstream model training.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The app appears to function as a simple pipeline rather than a complex agentic framework. There is no evidence of autonomous tool calling, planning loops, or dynamic memory systems that could be poisoned.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Operating as a browser-based application, it requires secure hosting and file-processing sandboxes to prevent remote code execution via malformed media files. Secrets management for backend API keys is also critical.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — No details are provided regarding transcription accuracy monitoring, input/output guardrails, or logging of anomalous file upload patterns.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The freemium, closed-source model lacks explicit mentions of compliance certifications (e.g., SOC2, GDPR), user authentication mechanisms, or granular access controls for stored transcriptions.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

The application operates as a standalone horizontal tool with no described multi-agent interactions, marketplace integrations, or agent-to-agent trust boundaries.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology — every score is re-derived by the same automated method as an agent's public evidence changes.