AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← using-superpowers

using-superpowers — agentic threat model

9.5AIVSS 9.5 · Critical

The 'using-superpowers' meta-skill introduces extreme agentic risk by forcing the aggressive, low-threshold (1% relevance) invocation of external skills and subagents. This drastically expands the attack surface for prompt injection and unintended tool execution without visible guardrails.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 1.02Factor sum 6.2/10Threat ×1.1Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.60
Self-Modification
0.70
Dynamic Tool Use
0.90
Persistent Memory
0.20
Contextual Awareness
0.80
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.60
Non-Determinism
0.80
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.70

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

The meta-skill relies heavily on the underlying LLM's reasoning to evaluate '1% relevance' for skill invocation, making it highly vulnerable to prompt injection and adversarial reprogramming that could force malicious skill execution.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — there is no mention of a specific vector database or RAG pipeline, though the skill-discovery bootstrap mechanism likely queries a local index or registry of available skills.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

This layer is highly critical. The meta-skill alters the orchestration framework by forcing pre-response skill invocation. This creates severe risks of insecure tool integration, infinite loops, and unintended tool execution due to the low (1%) relevance threshold.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the deployment environment (sandboxing, containerization) of the invoked skills is not specified, which is dangerous given the aggressive execution model.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — there are no mentioned guardrails, evaluation frameworks, or logging mechanisms to monitor, throttle, or block the rapid, low-relevance skill invocations.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no authentication, authorization, or policy enforcement mechanisms are described to restrict which skills can be discovered or invoked by this meta-skill.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

The 'subagent opt-out clause' and the ability to discover/invoke other skills directly impact the agent ecosystem, creating risks of cascading failures and trust abuse if a compromised subagent or skill is dynamically invoked.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).