AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Teenage-AGI

Teenage-AGI — agentic threat model

8.3AIVSS 8.3 · High

Teenage-AGI presents a moderate-to-high risk profile primarily driven by its infinite persistent memory via Pinecone, making it highly susceptible to long-term memory poisoning and indirect prompt injection that can persistently alter the agent's behavior across sessions.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 6.5AARS uplift 1.82Factor sum 5.2/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.40
Goal-Driven Planning
0.70
Self-Modification
0.50
Dynamic Tool Use
0.20
Persistent Memory
1.00
Contextual Awareness
0.80
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Utilizes GPT-4 as its foundation model. Primary threats include prompt injection that can hijack the agent's 'thinking' phase, and model alignment risks where the model generates inappropriate or harmful reasoning steps.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Integrates with Pinecone for vector storage to achieve infinite memory recall. This introduces severe risks of memory/knowledge-base poisoning, where malicious inputs are permanently stored and retrieved later, as well as data exfiltration of sensitive personal history stored in the vector database.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Based on a custom Python framework inspired by BabyAGI and Generative Agents. Vulnerable to memory poisoning and state manipulation, where corrupted memory recall disrupts the agent's planning and reasoning loops.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely run locally as a Python script. Main threats include insecure local storage of OpenAI and Pinecone API keys, and the lack of a sandboxed execution environment for the Python runtime.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no observability, logging, or guardrail mechanisms are mentioned. This creates a significant blind spot, making it difficult to detect when the agent's memory or reasoning has been compromised.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — being an open-source hobby/technology project, it lacks enterprise security controls, access management, or compliance alignments (such as GDPR for the 'infinite' personal data stored).

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — although inspired by interactive simulacra papers, there is no explicit multi-agent coordination or ecosystem integration described, meaning agent-to-agent trust abuse is currently a theoretical risk.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).