AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Shakker-ai image generator

Shakker-ai image generator — agentic threat model

6.2AIVSS 6.2 · Medium

The Shakker-ai image generator presents low agentic risk due to its lack of autonomy, planning, and tool-use capabilities, with its primary security concerns centered on model-level vulnerabilities such as adversarial prompt injection and the generation of harmful or copyrighted synthetic media.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 5.3AARS uplift 0.94Factor sum 2.0/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.00
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.10
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.20
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.80
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.70

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Uses text-to-image foundation models. Highly susceptible to adversarial prompt injection (jailbreaking to bypass safety filters), model stealing/distillation, and generating misaligned or copyrighted outputs.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely relies on large-scale image-text pre-training datasets. Vulnerable to data poisoning (e.g., Nightshade/Glaze) and lacks clear lineage or provenance tracking for generated assets.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely uses a simple pipeline rather than a complex agentic framework. Risks are limited to insecure parameter handling (e.g., resolution, style parameters) rather than tool misuse.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely hosted on GPU-enabled cloud infrastructure. Primary threats include GPU resource exhaustion (DoS) and unauthorized API access if endpoint authentication is weak.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely relies on basic input/output text filtering. Vulnerable to blind spots in detecting sophisticated deepfakes or policy-violating synthetic imagery.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — compliance with synthetic content regulations (such as watermarking requirements under the EU AI Act) and copyright policies is unverified.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no multi-agent or marketplace ecosystem is described. Risks are confined to standalone usage unless integrated into downstream automated publishing pipelines.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).