AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← parallel-feature-development

parallel-feature-development — agentic threat model

8.2AIVSS 8.2 · High

This agent skill coordinates multi-agent code development, presenting a moderate-to-high risk posture due to its orchestration of sub-agents and code-generation planning, though it lacks direct execution capabilities in its described state.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 6.3AARS uplift 1.9Factor sum 4.9/10Threat ×1.05Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.40
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.30
Persistent Memory
0.30
Contextual Awareness
0.70
Dynamic Identity
0.20
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.90
Non-Determinism
0.60
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The underlying foundation model is not specified, leaving it vulnerable to standard LLM risks such as prompt injection that could alter the generated interface contracts or decomposition strategies.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The agent relies on codebase context and architecture inputs, but the specific data operations, vector stores, or RAG mechanisms used to ingest the codebase are not detailed.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

The agent framework orchestrates planning, decomposition, and interface-contract design. Vulnerabilities here include flawed planning logic that could lead to insecure code boundaries or incorrect file-ownership rules.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The hosting, sandboxing, and execution environment for this orchestration skill are not specified, though secure sandboxing is critical if it evaluates generated code.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of built-in evaluation, logging, or guardrails to monitor how the agent decomposes tasks or to detect malicious sub-agent instructions.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Compliance policies, access controls, and identity management for the lead agent and its sub-agents are not defined in the public directory listing.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

This agent explicitly operates in a multi-agent ecosystem, shaping how a lead agent orchestrates sub-agents. It is highly vulnerable to agent-to-agent trust abuse, cascading failures, and malicious sub-agent coordination.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).