AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← New Relic MCP Server

New Relic MCP Server — agentic threat model

7.2AIVSS 7.2 · High

The New Relic MCP Server acts as a high-value bridge to sensitive telemetry, logs, and system entities, presenting significant data exposure risks if compromised, though bounded by NRQL query permissions.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 7.5AARS uplift 0.92Factor sum 3.5/10Threat ×1.05Mitigation ×0.85
Autonomy of Action
0.30
Goal-Driven Planning
0.20
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.70
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.60
Dynamic Identity
0.40
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.50
Non-Determinism
0.30
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.40

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The MCP server itself acts as a tool provider rather than hosting the foundation model; model-level vulnerabilities depend entirely on the external orchestrating agent.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Exposes highly sensitive operational telemetry, logs, and traces via NRQL. Risks include data exfiltration of proprietary system configurations, PII in logs, and metadata leakage through unauthorized queries.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Integrates as an MCP tool. Vulnerabilities include insecure tool execution where an orchestrating agent could be manipulated via prompt injection to run destructive or overly broad NRQL queries.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

Operates as a remote endpoint. Risks include unauthorized access to the endpoint, lack of transport encryption, or exposure of the host environment running the MCP server.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability✓ mapped

While the tool itself is designed for observability, there is a risk of insufficient logging of the agent's own queries, leading to blind spots regarding which agent executed which NRQL command.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

Relies on account scope and query permissions to restrict access. Security posture depends heavily on enforcing least-privilege API keys and robust IAM policies to prevent privilege escalation.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Designed to be called by other agents in an ecosystem. Threat of cascading failures or trust abuse if a compromised upstream agent uses this tool to map the entire infrastructure topology.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).