AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Mission Squad

Mission Squad — agentic threat model

9.4AIVSS 9.4 · Critical

Mission Squad is a highly collaborative multi-agent orchestration framework that introduces significant risk through cascading failures and agent-to-agent trust abuse. Its reliance on external LLM APIs and RAG pipelines increases the attack surface for prompt injection and data exfiltration across the agent chain.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.93Factor sum 6.2/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.70
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.30
Dynamic Tool Use
0.60
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.70
Dynamic Identity
0.20
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.90
Non-Determinism
0.80
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.70

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Integrates with multiple external foundation models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, Infermatic, LM Studio). Risks include adversarial prompt injection bypassing safety filters of individual models, and API key exposure during transit to these providers.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Utilizes RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as a key feature. This introduces risks of knowledge-base poisoning, unauthorized data retrieval via manipulated agent queries, and embedding inversion attacks.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Orchestrates workflows using prompt chaining and automation. Vulnerabilities include insecure tool integration within automated workflows and prompt injection hijacking the 'agent manager' to execute unauthorized actions.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — details regarding hosting environments, API credential storage, and execution sandboxing are not provided. Standard risks include container compromise and lateral movement if agent execution is not isolated.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — there is no mention of built-in evaluation, monitoring, logging, or guardrails. This creates blind spots in detecting anomalous agent behavior or malicious prompt propagation across the squad.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — compliance standards, identity management, and access control policies are not specified. Lack of robust authentication and audit trails could lead to unauthorized API usage and compliance violations.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Focuses heavily on multi-agent collaboration ('squads' managed by an agent manager). This creates a high risk of agent-to-agent trust abuse, where a single compromised agent can propagate malicious payloads or commands to the entire squad, leading to cascading failures.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).