AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← LoopGPT

LoopGPT — agentic threat model

7.9AIVSS 7.9 · High

LoopGPT is a highly autonomous Auto-GPT clone that poses significant security risks due to its goal-driven planning and custom tool integration capabilities, though its human-in-the-loop feature and state serialization offer pathways for monitoring and intervention.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.4AARS uplift 0.91Factor sum 5.7/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.85
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.40
Dynamic Tool Use
0.70
Persistent Memory
0.80
Contextual Awareness
0.60
Dynamic Identity
0.20
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — mentions GPT-3.5 compatibility but does not specify built-in model-level defenses against adversarial examples, prompt injection, or output alignment.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — mentions full state serialization but does not detail vector database integrations, data poisoning protections, or exfiltration controls.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

As an Auto-GPT reimplementation, the framework is highly susceptible to prompt injection leading to tool misuse, insecure tool integration, and potential state serialization tampering.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — being a Python package, deployment security, sandboxing of tool execution, and secrets management are left entirely to the implementing developer.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — state serialization allows saving/loading agent state, but there are no explicit mentions of real-time guardrails, drift detection, or security logging.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — as an open-source framework, it lacks built-in enterprise compliance controls, identity/access management, or formal audit trails.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — does not explicitly define multi-agent orchestration or marketplace interactions, focusing instead on single-agent Auto-GPT loops.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).