AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← HAL (HTTP MCP)

HAL (HTTP MCP) — agentic threat model

9.1AIVSS 9.1 · Critical

HAL presents a high-risk profile as a general-purpose HTTP client tool with secret substitution, creating significant SSRF, data exfiltration, and credential theft vectors if integrated into an agent framework without strict network sandboxing and input validation.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.6AARS uplift 0.52Factor sum 3.4/10Threat ×1.1Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.40
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.30
Dynamic Identity
0.70
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.30

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — HAL is an MCP tool/client rather than a foundation model itself, but host LLMs invoking it are highly vulnerable to indirect prompt injection via untrusted HTTP response bodies returned by the tool.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — HAL does not maintain a vector database or training pipeline, but it acts as a direct data ingestion and egress channel, risking data exfiltration and ingestion of poisoned web content.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

HAL integrates as an MCP tool, presenting a massive attack surface where the host agent framework can be manipulated into executing unauthorized HTTP methods (GET/POST/DELETE) or SSRF attacks due to insecure tool integration.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

The tool runs as an MCP server; without strict network sandboxing and egress filtering, it can access internal loopback addresses (localhost) and private cloud metadata services (SSRF).

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — No built-in logging, guardrails, or evaluation mechanisms are mentioned, making it difficult to detect anomalous HTTP requests or credential abuse in real-time.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

Features secret substitution which concentrates sensitive API keys and credentials, but lacks built-in access control, authorization policies, or audit logging for these secrets.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

As an open-source MCP tool, it can be easily integrated into multi-agent workflows, potentially allowing compromised downstream agents to abuse its HTTP capabilities to exfiltrate data or call external APIs.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).