AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← entanglr/zettelkasten-mcp

entanglr/zettelkasten-mcp — agentic threat model

6.2AIVSS 6.2 · Medium

This agent acts as a local Zettelkasten knowledge-management tool via MCP, presenting a low-to-moderate risk profile primarily centered around local file system manipulation and potential indirect prompt injection through retrieved note content.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 5.3AARS uplift 1.56Factor sum 3.5/10Threat ×0.95Mitigation ×0.9
Autonomy of Action
0.30
Goal-Driven Planning
0.20
Self-Modification
0.40
Dynamic Tool Use
0.30
Persistent Memory
0.80
Contextual Awareness
0.50
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.40
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.30

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The agent relies on external LLMs via MCP-compatible clients. The primary L1 threat is indirect prompt injection, where malicious instructions embedded in retrieved notes could hijack the host model's behavior.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

The agent maintains a linked note graph locally. The primary threat is data poisoning of the local markdown/text files, which acts as the agent's primary retrieval and injection surface.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Orchestrated via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Vulnerabilities include insecure tool integration if the client allows arbitrary file path traversal or execution during note creation, linking, and searching.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

The agent runs locally. The primary infrastructure threat is unauthorized local file access or directory traversal if the MCP server does not properly restrict note storage to a sandboxed directory.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of built-in logging, evaluation, or input/output guardrails to detect malicious payloads or anomalous note-linking behavior.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Access controls and authorization policies are delegated entirely to the host operating system and the parent MCP client running the server.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Designed to interface with other agents via MCP clients. A compromised orchestrator or peer agent could abuse the Zettelkasten tools to exfiltrate sensitive local notes or write malicious payloads into the knowledge base.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).