AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Crazzers AI

Crazzers AI — agentic threat model

7.3AIVSS 7.3 · High

Crazzers AI presents low operational and systemic risk due to its limited autonomy and lack of external tool integration, but poses a high confidentiality and privacy risk due to the highly sensitive, intimate nature of NSFW conversational data stored in its persistent memory.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 6.5AARS uplift 1.15Factor sum 3.3/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.95
Autonomy of Action
0.20
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.30
Dynamic Tool Use
0.10
Persistent Memory
0.70
Contextual Awareness
0.50
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.10
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely utilizes open-source LLMs fine-tuned for conversational roleplay. Primary threats include prompt injection to bypass safety/NSFW boundaries, model reprogramming, and extraction of system instructions.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — claims to be 'fully private' and 'blockchain-powered'. The primary threat is the exfiltration or unauthorized exposure of highly sensitive, intimate user chat logs and personalized memory embeddings.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely uses a basic chat orchestration framework with persistent memory. The main threat is memory poisoning, where malicious user inputs permanently alter the companion's persona or behavior.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — mentions 'blockchain-powered' and 'open source'. If self-hosted, infrastructure security is user-dependent; if hosted, threats include server-side database compromise and potential smart contract vulnerabilities.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no observability or guardrail mechanisms are mentioned. Given the NSFW nature, traditional safety guardrails are likely relaxed, increasing the risk of generating toxic or abusive content under adversarial prompting.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — claims 'fully secure' but lacks formal compliance details. Handling intimate personal data introduces severe privacy compliance risks (e.g., GDPR/CCPA) regarding data deletion and user consent.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

The agent operates as a standalone personalized companion platform with no indicated multi-agent interactions or marketplace integrations, making ecosystem-level cascading failures a low risk.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).