AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← cognee

cognee — agentic threat model

7.7AIVSS 7.7 · High

Cognee is a specialized memory and knowledge-graph orchestration framework; its primary risk lies in data poisoning and unauthorized exfiltration of interconnected organizational knowledge rather than autonomous action execution.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 6.5AARS uplift 1.22Factor sum 3.5/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.20
Goal-Driven Planning
0.30
Self-Modification
0.10
Dynamic Tool Use
0.20
Persistent Memory
0.90
Contextual Awareness
0.80
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.10
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.40

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models✓ mapped

Integrates with external LLM providers (Anyscale, OpenAI) or local models (Ollama). Risks include prompt injection altering the extraction logic during the 'Cognify' phase, and potential data leakage to third-party LLM APIs.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

Highly critical layer for Cognee. Supports LanceDB, Qdrant, PGVector, Weaviate, NetworkX, and Neo4j. Threats include vector/graph database poisoning, unauthorized graph traversal leading to data exfiltration, and lack of document-level access controls during retrieval.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Implements ECL (Extract, Cognify, Load) pipelines. Vulnerabilities could arise from insecure pipeline execution, memory poisoning of past conversations, and lack of sanitization on extracted metadata before loading into graph/vector stores.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

Runs locally by default (LanceDB, NetworkX, Ollama), which limits external network exposure but places the security burden entirely on the host environment. If deployed in a shared cloud environment, insecure database connections or exposed API endpoints pose significant risks.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The directory listing does not mention built-in evaluation, monitoring, or guardrail mechanisms to detect drift, anomalous queries, or poisoned data ingestion within the ECL pipelines.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of authentication, authorization, role-based access control (RBAC) for data retrieval, or compliance certifications (e.g., SOC2, GDPR) for handling sensitive personal documents.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The framework is presented as a standalone memory/knowledge layer and does not explicitly detail multi-agent communication protocols or marketplace integrations.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).