AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← chatrecap

chatrecap — agentic threat model

7.9AIVSS 7.9 · High

Chatrecap is a low-autonomy, single-purpose utility agent whose primary security risk lies in the handling and processing of highly sensitive, user-uploaded chat histories, making it a prime target for data exfiltration and prompt injection.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 7.5AARS uplift 0.38Factor sum 1.5/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.10
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.40
Dynamic Identity
0.00
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.40
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.30

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely utilizes a third-party foundation model (e.g., OpenAI or Anthropic) to perform sentiment and relationship analysis. The primary threat is indirect prompt injection, where malicious instructions embedded within the uploaded chat history hijack the model's behavior.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — processes raw chat history files uploaded by users. Threats include data exfiltration of highly sensitive personal conversations, lack of data minimization/anonymization before processing, and potential parser vulnerabilities when handling malformed chat logs.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely uses a lightweight orchestration script or basic LLM framework to chunk and feed chat logs to the model. Threats include insecure handling of context windows and lack of input validation on the parsed chat structure.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — as an open-source web agent, deployment could range from local hosting to cloud platforms (e.g., Vercel). Threats include insecure storage of API keys, lack of transport layer security for uploaded logs, and container escape if hosted in an un-sandboxed environment.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely lacks active guardrails or real-time monitoring for malicious payloads within the uploaded chat files, creating a blind spot for abusive or exploitative inputs.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — handling personal chat histories introduces significant privacy compliance risks (GDPR/CCPA). There is no evidence of built-in data retention policies, consent mechanisms, or access controls in the public listing.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

The agent operates as an isolated, standalone utility tool. It does not interact with other agents or participate in an agent marketplace, resulting in negligible ecosystem-level threats.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).