AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← BabyCatAGI

BabyCatAGI — agentic threat model

8.7AIVSS 8.7 · High

BabyCatAGI is a highly lightweight, autonomous agent framework vulnerable to indirect prompt injection due to its integrated web scraping and extraction tools. The lack of built-in sandboxing or security guardrails in its minimal codebase presents a high risk of arbitrary task execution if exposed to untrusted web data.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 7.5AARS uplift 1.2Factor sum 4.8/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.70
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.50
Persistent Memory
0.30
Contextual Awareness
0.60
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.30
Non-Determinism
0.80
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The specific foundation models used are not defined, but the framework is highly susceptible to indirect prompt injection and reprogramming via adversarial web content ingested during scraping.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While the agent performs chunking, extraction, and scraping, the storage mechanism (e.g., vector database) is unspecified. Risks include ingestion of poisoned data and potential exfiltration of scraped sensitive information.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

BabyCatAGI's lightweight 300-line orchestration code is highly vulnerable to tool misuse and control-flow hijacking, as untrusted data retrieved from web scraping can directly influence the task creation and execution loop.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — No deployment or sandboxing details are provided. Running this lightweight script in an un-sandboxed environment poses a risk of local system compromise if the agent is manipulated into executing malicious commands.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of built-in logging, observability, or guardrail mechanisms, which likely results in complete blind spots during autonomous task execution.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — As an open-source developer framework, it lacks built-in identity, authorization, or policy enforcement controls, shifting all compliance and security responsibilities to the deployer.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The framework uses internal specialized sub-agents (task creation and execution), but does not natively integrate with a broader multi-agent ecosystem or marketplace where cascading trust abuse could occur.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).