AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← auto-release-manager

auto-release-manager — agentic threat model

9.4AIVSS 9.4 · Critical

The auto-release-manager presents a high supply-chain risk profile due to its write access to git repositories and release tooling, which could be exploited to inject malicious code or unauthorized releases if the underlying LLM is compromised or manipulated.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.8AARS uplift 0.6Factor sum 5.0/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.70
Self-Modification
0.10
Dynamic Tool Use
0.90
Persistent Memory
0.20
Contextual Awareness
0.60
Dynamic Identity
0.70
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.10
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.40

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — relies on Claude (via Claude Code) as the foundation model. Threats include prompt injection leading to unauthorized git commands or malicious changelog generation.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the 'data' is the local codebase and git history. Risks include repository poisoning where malicious commits trick the agent into incorrect version bumps or executing malicious release scripts.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Integrates as a Claude Code plugin. Tool misuse is a major threat, as the agent has write access to git and release tooling, which could be abused to push unauthorized code, delete tags, or leak secrets.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — runs locally within the user's development environment or CI/CD pipeline. Lacks sandboxing by default, meaning a compromise could lead to local host compromise or credential theft (SSH keys, API tokens).

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no built-in guardrails or logging mechanisms are described. Relying solely on Claude Code's native output visibility, creating blind spots during automated execution.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — no explicit authorization policies or compliance controls are mentioned. It inherits the permissions of the local user running Claude Code, lacking fine-grained access control.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — operates primarily as a standalone plugin, but could interact with upstream package registries (npm, GitHub) where compromised dependencies could cause cascading supply chain failures.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).