AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← Auto Directory Submission

Auto Directory Submission — agentic threat model

7.1AIVSS 7.1 · High

The Auto Directory Submission agent is a browser-based form-filling assistant with low overall agentic risk, but it presents a concentrated client-side security risk due to its access to sensitive company profiles, local storage, and broad browser permissions required for universal website compatibility.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 7.2AARS uplift 0.64Factor sum 2.3/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.9
Autonomy of Action
0.30
Goal-Driven Planning
0.20
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.20
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.40
Dynamic Identity
0.20
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.30
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.20

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The specific foundation model or API used for generating contextual responses is not disclosed. A key threat is indirect prompt injection, where malicious form fields on a target website manipulate the underlying model into leaking profile data or generating malicious payloads.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

The agent utilizes 'privacy-first local storage' to manage company profiles. While local storage reduces cloud-based exposure, threats include unauthorized local access, lack of encryption at rest for sensitive profile data, and potential data exfiltration if the browser session or extension sandbox is compromised.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The orchestration logic for mapping profiles to DOM fields is not detailed. Threats include insecure tool integration where the form-filling engine is tricked into interacting with hidden, malicious DOM elements or executing unauthorized state-changing actions on a webpage.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

The agent is deployed as a Chrome extension, requiring broad host permissions to achieve 'universal website compatibility'. This exposes the user to extension-level supply chain attacks, permission abuse, and potential cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities if the extension improperly sanitizes DOM inputs.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of built-in guardrails, input/output filtering, or logging mechanisms to monitor what data the AI generates and inputs into directory forms, creating a blind spot for automated data submission errors.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

The agent is 'Open Source', allowing public code audits, and emphasizes local data privacy. However, it lacks enterprise-grade security controls such as role-based access control (RBAC) for multiple profile management or explicit encryption standards for stored credentials.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The agent operates as a standalone browser utility and does not appear to participate in a multi-agent ecosystem or marketplace, minimizing cascading failure risks from agent-to-agent trust abuse.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).