AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← asana

asana — agentic threat model

7.5AIVSS 7.5 · High

This agent integrates Claude with Asana via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), introducing moderate risk due to its ability to modify project management data, assign tasks, and access corporate project structures.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 6.5AARS uplift 1.4Factor sum 4.0/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.95
Autonomy of Action
0.60
Goal-Driven Planning
0.40
Self-Modification
0.10
Dynamic Tool Use
0.50
Persistent Memory
0.30
Contextual Awareness
0.60
Dynamic Identity
0.40
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.40

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — relies on Claude as the underlying foundation model. Threats include prompt injection leading to unauthorized tool execution or unintended task modifications.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the agent queries and searches Asana projects. Risks include data exfiltration of sensitive project details or poisoning of project context via malicious task descriptions.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Utilizes the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to expose Asana API tools (create, search, update). Vulnerable to tool misuse and insecure tool integration if input validation is not strictly enforced on the MCP server side.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

The MCP server acts as the local or remote hosting infrastructure. Risks include exposed local ports, insecure storage of Asana API tokens, and lack of sandboxing for the MCP runtime environment.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — there is no mention of logging, guardrails, or transaction monitoring for actions taken by the agent within Asana.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

Relies on Asana authentication (OAuth or Personal Access Tokens) to establish identity. Access control is bound to the permissions of the authenticated user, but lacks explicit mention of fine-grained authorization policies.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Operates as a bundled plugin within the Claude/MCP ecosystem. Risks include cascading failures if other active plugins or agents interact with this tool to manipulate Asana tasks without human oversight.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).