AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← AgentKit

AgentKit — agentic threat model

8.6AIVSS 8.6 · High

AgentKit is an open-source multi-agent orchestration framework supporting external tools and Anthropic MCP, which introduces significant security risks regarding agent-to-agent trust, cascading failures, and unauthorized tool execution if deployed without strict sandboxing and input validation.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 1.01Factor sum 6.4/10Threat ×1.05Mitigation ×0.9
Autonomy of Action
0.70
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.30
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.70
Dynamic Identity
0.40
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.90
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — AgentKit is model-agnostic, supporting single model inference calls and Anthropic MCP. Foundation model threats (adversarial prompt injection, model alignment bypasses) will depend entirely on the specific LLMs integrated by the developer.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The directory listing does not specify built-in vector stores or RAG data operations. Data poisoning and exfiltration risks depend on how developers implement data pipelines within the customizable workflows.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

As an orchestration framework, AgentKit directly manages planning, workflows, and tool calling. Vulnerabilities at this layer include insecure tool integration, workflow bypasses via prompt injection, and logic flaws in modular agent orchestration.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Being an open-source framework, deployment and infrastructure security (such as container sandboxing, secrets management for tool APIs, and network isolation) are left entirely to the end-user.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While the framework mentions rate limiting, it does not detail built-in evaluation, logging, or guardrail mechanisms, leaving potential blind spots in monitoring agent behavior and detecting anomalies.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

The framework provides basic 'Rate limiting' as a built-in control, but lacks explicit mention of enterprise security controls like role-based access control (RBAC), audit logging, or compliance certifications, which must be implemented externally.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

With explicit support for 'Modular agent collaboration' and 'multi-agent systems', the framework is highly exposed to ecosystem threats such as agent-to-agent trust abuse, cascading failures across collaborative workflows, and malicious tool usage via MCP.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).