AgentReadyHomeAgent Listing

← aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-jira

aashari/mcp-server-atlassian-jira — agentic threat model

8.5AIVSS 8.5 · High

This agent acts as a direct bridge to Atlassian Jira Cloud, presenting significant risk due to write-access capabilities on issues and comments which can be abused for prompt injection or unauthorized project modifications if the underlying LLM is compromised.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 7.5AARS uplift 0.97Factor sum 3.7/10Threat ×1.05Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.60
Goal-Driven Planning
0.40
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.70
Persistent Memory
0.20
Contextual Awareness
0.50
Dynamic Identity
0.30
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.30
Non-Determinism
0.40
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.30

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The MCP server itself does not specify a foundation model, but the host LLM is highly vulnerable to indirect prompt injection via malicious Jira issue descriptions or comments ingested during real-time queries.

L2 · Data Operations✓ mapped

The agent performs real-time queries on Jira projects, issues, and comments. This creates a direct data exfiltration risk if an attacker can inject instructions into a Jira ticket that forces the agent to leak sensitive project data.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

The agent exposes tools for reading and writing Jira issues and comments. Framework-level vulnerabilities include tool misuse where a compromised planner could delete, modify, or spam Jira issues using the provided MCP tool definitions.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The hosting environment of the MCP server is unspecified, but it relies on Jira API tokens for authentication. Insecure storage of these tokens on the host infrastructure poses a high risk of credential theft.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of built-in logging, audit trails, or guardrails to monitor and intercept malicious tool calls or anomalous Jira modifications before they execute.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

Access control is entirely dependent on the scope of the provided Jira API token. If the token is over-privileged, the agent inherits full write/delete permissions across all accessible Jira projects without secondary authorization.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

As an MCP server, this agent is designed to be orchestrated by other host agents. This introduces cascading risks where a compromised upstream orchestrator can abuse this agent to manipulate Jira project states.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).