AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Secra

Secra — agentic threat model

6.3AIVSS 6.3 · Medium

Secra has a low agentic risk posture as it operates as a defensive security proxy rather than an autonomous agent. However, as an inline intermediary, any compromise or bypass of its filtering capabilities represents a single point of failure for the security of the connected agent ecosystem.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 7.5AARS uplift 0.35Factor sum 1.4/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.8
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.00
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.10
Persistent Memory
0.10
Contextual Awareness
0.40
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.20
Non-Determinism
0.20
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.20

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Secra sits between agents and LLMs, but the listing does not specify if Secra uses its own internal foundation models for classification or relies on heuristics/deterministic signatures.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While it blocks data exfiltration, it is unclear if Secra stores, logs, or vectorizes the interaction data it intercepts, which could create a secondary data exposure risk.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

Secra acts as an intermediary security layer specifically designed to protect agent frameworks from prompt injection, persona hijacking, and tool-based data exfiltration.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — As an API-based intermediary, its deployment model (SaaS vs. self-hosted) is not detailed, leaving potential risks regarding transit encryption and container sandboxing unaddressed.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability✓ mapped

Secra directly addresses this layer by providing real-time monitoring, threat detection, and guardrails against malicious inputs and unauthorized data exfiltration.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Although it enforces security policies (preventing hijacking and exfiltration), the listing does not detail its own access controls, compliance certifications, or audit logging capabilities.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Secra mitigates ecosystem-level risks by securing the communication path between agents and LLMs, preventing cascading failures caused by compromised agents or malicious inputs.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.