AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Recruit CRM

Recruit CRM — agentic threat model

8.4AIVSS 8.4 · High

Recruit CRM presents a moderate-to-high risk profile primarily due to its handling of sensitive candidate PII and recruitment data across a global user base. The lack of transparency regarding its closed-source AI matching models and data processing pipelines necessitates cautious deployment and strict external access controls.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.2AARS uplift 0.68Factor sum 3.6/10Threat ×1.05Mitigation ×0.95
Autonomy of Action
0.40
Goal-Driven Planning
0.30
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.40
Persistent Memory
0.80
Contextual Awareness
0.50
Dynamic Identity
0.20
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.10
Non-Determinism
0.40
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The specific LLMs or foundation models used for parsing or matching are not disclosed. Potential threats include prompt injection leading to biased candidate screening or data leakage.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While it manages extensive candidate PII and CRM data, the underlying vector database or RAG architecture is unspecified. Threats include data poisoning of candidate profiles and unauthorized data exfiltration.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The orchestration framework for the AI agents is closed-source and unspecified. Threats include insecure tool integration with email/calendar systems and manipulation of automated recruitment workflows.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The hosting environment (likely public cloud) and sandboxing mechanisms are not detailed. Threats include container compromise or unauthorized access to the multi-tenant database.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — No details are provided regarding bias monitoring, drift detection, or audit logging for AI-driven hiring decisions. Threats include undetected algorithmic bias and lack of auditability.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Although used globally, specific compliance certifications (e.g., GDPR, SOC2) are not explicitly detailed in the listing. Threats include regulatory non-compliance regarding automated decision-making.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no explicit mention of multi-agent orchestration or third-party agent marketplace integrations. Threats are limited to standard API integrations with external job boards and email providers.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.