AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Pharmie AI

Pharmie AI — agentic threat model

9.0AIVSS 9.0 · Critical

Pharmie AI operates in a high-stakes healthcare environment handling sensitive patient data and pharmacy workflows, presenting severe risks of clinical errors, HIPAA violations, or unauthorized prescription modifications if compromised.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.52Factor sum 3.5/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.30
Goal-Driven Planning
0.40
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.50
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.60
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.10
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely relies on medical-domain or general-purpose LLMs. Threats include clinical misinformation, adversarial prompt injection altering dosage/drug recommendations, and model hallucination.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely processes sensitive PHI, prescription histories, and drug databases. Threats include unauthorized PHI exfiltration, HIPAA violations, and poisoning of drug interaction databases.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — orchestration likely manages workflows between patient queries and pharmacy databases. Threats include insecure tool execution leading to unauthorized database modifications or prescription alterations.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — hosting must comply with healthcare standards (e.g., HIPAA-compliant cloud). Threats include insecure API endpoints exposing patient data or lack of network isolation between tenant databases.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — requires rigorous clinical safety guardrails and drift monitoring. Threats include silent failures in drug interaction logic or lack of audit logs for clinical decisions.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — must adhere to strict healthcare regulations (HIPAA, HITECH). Threats include lack of robust RBAC for pharmacists vs. patients and insufficient audit trails for compliance.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — may interact with external insurer agents or e-prescribing networks. Threats include cascading trust failures if an external insurance verification agent is compromised.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.