AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Olas

Olas — agentic threat model

9.1AIVSS 9.1 · Critical

Olas presents a high-risk agentic profile due to its decentralized, multi-agent blockchain framework where autonomous agents manage financial transactions and cryptographic identities, making them prime targets for smart contract exploitation and A2A trust abuse.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 1.06Factor sum 6.4/10Threat ×1.1Mitigation ×0.95
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.70
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.60
Dynamic Identity
0.80
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.90
Non-Determinism
0.50
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The framework is model-agnostic, meaning foundation model selection, alignment, and vulnerability to adversarial prompts depend entirely on the developer's implementation.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While agents interact with blockchain state data, specific RAG, vector database integrations, or data provenance controls are not detailed in the directory listing.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

As an open-source agent framework, vulnerabilities in the orchestration code, insecure tool integration (especially Web3/blockchain APIs), and malicious package dependencies pose significant risks to deployed agents.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

Agents run on decentralized infrastructure operated by individual participants. This introduces risks of host/container compromise, insecure RPC node connections, and private key exposure by operators.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The directory listing does not specify built-in evaluation, logging, or real-time anomaly detection mechanisms for monitoring agent behavior across decentralized nodes.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

Security relies heavily on decentralized governance (OLAS token holders) and cryptographic signatures rather than traditional centralized identity and access management (IAM) systems.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

The core value proposition is a multi-agent economy. This creates a high exposure to agent-to-agent trust abuse, cascading failures, and economic exploits where malicious agents manipulate decentralized protocols.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.