AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Nimble AI

Nimble AI — agentic threat model

9.2AIVSS 9.2 · Critical

Nimble AI acts as a collaborative hub and marketplace for AI agents, presenting significant supply-chain and ecosystem risks where malicious or compromised agents could be distributed to users. The inclusion of development tools like the AI Notebook also introduces risks of arbitrary code execution if not properly sandboxed.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.72Factor sum 4.8/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.50
Goal-Driven Planning
0.40
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.60
Persistent Memory
0.40
Contextual Awareness
0.50
Dynamic Identity
0.30
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.80
Non-Determinism
0.60
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The listing does not specify which foundation models are supported, hosted, or utilized by the platform, leaving model-specific threats like membership inference or model stealing unverified.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While the platform includes an 'AI Orderbook' and 'AI Notebook', details regarding data pipelines, vector databases, or training data protections are not provided.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

The platform provides an 'AI Notebook' for streamlined development and orchestration of agents. This introduces risks of insecure tool integration, malicious code execution during agent development, and framework-level vulnerabilities if agent execution environments are not strictly isolated.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The infrastructure hosting the 'AI Notebook' and 'AI Orderbook' is not described, making it impossible to verify sandboxing, container isolation, or privilege escalation controls.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of built-in evaluation frameworks, logging, or guardrails to monitor the behavior of developed or published agents.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Although monetization and ownership are mentioned, the specific identity, access control, and compliance mechanisms (such as financial or data privacy regulations) are not detailed.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

Highly relevant as Nimble AI is an 'AI Agent Hub' and 'sharing economy'. This ecosystem model introduces severe risks of supply-chain attacks, rogue or compromised agents being published, and cascading failures during multi-agent collaboration.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.