AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← MyBunny AI

MyBunny AI — agentic threat model

7.4AIVSS 7.4 · High

MyBunny AI is a low-autonomy conversational companion platform with high non-determinism due to its unfiltered, creative nature. Its primary security risks center around user privacy, data exposure of sensitive NSFW interactions, and the lack of input/output guardrails.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 6.5AARS uplift 0.91Factor sum 2.6/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.20
Goal-Driven Planning
0.10
Self-Modification
0.20
Dynamic Tool Use
0.00
Persistent Memory
0.40
Contextual Awareness
0.30
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.00
Non-Determinism
0.80
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — likely utilizes open-source foundation models optimized for creative writing. The explicit lack of filters makes the model highly susceptible to adversarial jailbreaks, prompt injection, and generating extreme or misaligned outputs.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the platform must store highly sensitive, potentially NSFW user chat histories and customization profiles. This creates a high-value target for data exfiltration, credential theft, or database leaks if proper encryption is not implemented.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — orchestration appears limited to basic chat memory management and system prompt customization. Risks include session state pollution and prompt injection that could permanently corrupt a companion's persona.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — being open-source and freemium, deployment could range from local hosting to multi-tenant cloud environments. Risks include insecure default configurations, lack of tenant isolation, and potential host compromise if self-hosted without sandboxing.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — the platform's focus on 'no unnecessary filters or restrictions' strongly implies a lack of real-time safety guardrails, input filtering, or output monitoring, leading to high exposure to toxic or harmful content generation.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — handling highly personal and NSFW companion data requires strict privacy compliance (e.g., GDPR, CCPA) and robust access controls, which are not detailed and may be lacking in self-hosted or early-stage deployments.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

The platform operates as a standalone companion chat interface with no integration into a multi-agent ecosystem or external marketplaces mentioned, minimizing cascading ecosystem risks.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.