AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← Lendle

Lendle — agentic threat model

7.8AIVSS 7.8 · High

Lendle is a Web3 non-custodial lending protocol rather than an AI agent, meaning its risks are centered on smart contract vulnerabilities, oracle manipulation, and financial exploits rather than LLM-specific threats.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.15Factor sum 1.0/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×0.9
Autonomy of Action
0.10
Goal-Driven Planning
0.00
Self-Modification
0.00
Dynamic Tool Use
0.30
Persistent Memory
0.20
Contextual Awareness
0.10
Dynamic Identity
0.10
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.10
Non-Determinism
0.00
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.10

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Lendle is a Web3 lending platform and does not explicitly mention using LLMs or foundation models; threats like adversarial prompt injection or model stealing are likely not applicable unless AI is used for market analysis.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The platform relies on blockchain state and oracle price feeds rather than traditional vector databases or RAG pipelines; primary threats involve oracle manipulation or data feed poisoning.

L3 · Agent Frameworks⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — No AI agent orchestration framework is mentioned; the execution logic is handled by deterministic smart contracts on the Mantle Network.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure✓ mapped

Lendle is deployed on the Mantle Network. Infrastructure threats include smart contract vulnerabilities, reentrancy attacks, flash loan exploits, and compromise of front-end hosting or RPC nodes.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Traditional AI evaluation and drift monitoring are not described; security relies on smart contract audits, bug bounties, and on-chain transaction monitoring.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)✓ mapped

As a closed-source, non-custodial Web3 platform, security relies on cryptographic signatures, smart contract access controls, and liquidation math. Compliance risks include regulatory scrutiny of DeFi lending and token distribution.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no evidence of an AI agent ecosystem or multi-agent collaboration; interactions are limited to standard Web3 wallet connections and smart contract integrations.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.