AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← IX

IX — agentic threat model

9.5AIVSS 9.5 · Critical

IX is an open-source platform focused on multi-agent collaboration and cognitive workflows, presenting a high-risk profile due to potential agent-to-agent trust abuse and the complexity of securing distributed agentic interactions without built-in sandboxing.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 0.98Factor sum 6.5/10Threat ×1.0Mitigation ×1.0
Autonomy of Action
0.80
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.30
Dynamic Tool Use
0.70
Persistent Memory
0.70
Contextual Awareness
0.70
Dynamic Identity
0.50
Multi-Agent Interactions
0.90
Non-Determinism
0.60
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.50

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — IX is an open-source platform for building agents, meaning it likely integrates with external foundation models (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, or local models via Ollama). It does not specify a native foundation model, making it susceptible to model-agnostic threats like prompt injection or adversarial reprogramming depending on the user's choice of LLM.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — The platform supports cognitive workflows, which typically involve RAG or vector databases, but specific data operations, vector store integrations, or data poisoning protections are not detailed in the brief description.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

As a platform for building collaborative agents and cognitive workflows, IX directly implements orchestration, planning, and memory frameworks. This introduces risks of insecure tool integration, framework vulnerabilities, and memory poisoning if agent interactions are not strictly validated.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Being an open-source platform, deployment is likely self-hosted or containerized. The listing does not specify built-in sandboxing, secrets management, or network isolation controls, leaving infrastructure security largely to the deployer.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability✓ mapped

IX explicitly highlights 'debugging' as a key feature of its platform. This implies built-in observability or execution tracing, which helps mitigate blind spots but must be secured to prevent sensitive data leakage through execution logs.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — There is no mention of enterprise security controls, role-based access control (RBAC), authentication mechanisms, or compliance certifications (like SOC2 or ISO) in the public description.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

IX is designed for 'collaborative Agents', indicating a strong multi-agent ecosystem focus. This introduces significant risks of agent-to-agent trust abuse, cascading failures, and malicious agent interactions within a shared workflow.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.