AgentReadyHomeAgent ListingPricing

← AgentScope

AgentScope — agentic threat model

9.1AIVSS 9.1 · Critical

AgentScope is a highly capable multi-agent orchestration framework whose distributed execution, MCP integration, and automatic prompt tuning introduce significant risks of cascading agent-to-agent trust abuse and unauthorized tool execution if deployed without strict infrastructure-level sandboxing.

OWASP AIVSS score rationale

AIVSS = (CVSS_Base + AARS) × Mitigation_Factor, where AARS = (10 − CVSS_Base) × (Factor_Sum / 10) × ThM
CVSS base 8.5AARS uplift 1.07Factor sum 6.8/10Threat ×1.05Mitigation ×0.95
Autonomy of Action
0.70
Goal-Driven Planning
0.80
Self-Modification
0.60
Dynamic Tool Use
0.80
Persistent Memory
0.50
Contextual Awareness
0.70
Dynamic Identity
0.40
Multi-Agent Interactions
1.00
Non-Determinism
0.70
Opacity & Reflexivity
0.60

Scored with the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula (AIVSS calculator reference); agentic risk factors estimated from the agent’s described capabilities.

MAESTRO 7-layer threat model

Per-layer threats for this agent. Layers tagged “not certain from listing” are general, caveated commentary where the public description didn’t pin that layer.

L1 · Foundation Models⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — AgentScope is model-agnostic, but its automatic prompt tuning feature could be vulnerable to prompt injection or adversarial reprogramming if untrusted inputs influence the tuning process.

L2 · Data Operations⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — While it supports tools and MCP, specific data storage, vector databases, or RAG pipeline security controls are not detailed in the directory listing.

L3 · Agent Frameworks✓ mapped

As an orchestration framework, primary risks include insecure tool integration via MCP, prompt injection exploiting automatic prompt tuning, and message-passing manipulation between agents.

L4 · Deployment & Infrastructure⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — Distributed execution and actor-based distribution imply network-level communication, but specific sandboxing, containerization, or secret management controls are not detailed.

L5 · Evaluation & Observability✓ mapped

Features built-in monitoring and fault tolerance, which helps detect failures, but lacks explicit details on security-focused guardrails or anomaly detection for malicious agent behavior.

L6 · Security & Compliance (cross-cutting)⚠ not certain from listing

Not certain from the listing — As an open-source framework, security controls like identity management, access policies, and compliance audits are left to the deploying developer.

L7 · Agent Ecosystem✓ mapped

High risk of cascading failures and agent-to-agent trust abuse due to its explicit multi-agent orchestration, actor-based distributed execution, and Model Context Protocol integration.

MAESTRO — the 7-layer agentic threat-modeling framework (Cloud Security Alliance / Ken Huang).

These scores are auto-generated from public information (the agent's own listing, docs, and repository) using the canonical OWASP AIVSS formula and the MAESTRO framework — an estimate for guidance, not a penetration test, audit, or certification. See the scoring methodology. Are you the vendor? Factual corrections are free.